Close
Yale anthropologist Lisa Messeri and Princeton cognitive scientist M. J. Crockett highlight the risks associated with artificial intelligence in scientific research. They discuss how AI tools, when working as intended, may narrow the range of questions researchers ask, impacting the future of science and knowledge production. The article delves into the epistemic risks AI poses to the sciences, focusing on how knowledge is produced and the potential implications for the scientific community.
The co-authors emphasize that the concern is not about AI errors but rather about the implications when AI tools function perfectly. They question whether AI, by narrowing the scope of questions asked, could lead to unintended consequences in scientific research. Messeri and Crockett caution against the overreliance on AI in scientific endeavors, highlighting the importance of maintaining diverse perspectives and questioning the necessity of AI in all research initiatives.
San Deigo State Daily Aztec 13month
Isomorphic Labs, the AI drug discovery platform that was spun out of Google's DeepMind in 2021, has raised external capital for the first time. The $600
How to level up your teaching with AI. Discover how to use clones and GPTs in your classroom—personalized AI teaching is the future.
Trump's Third Term? AI already knows how this can be done. A study shows how OpenAI, Grok, DeepSeek & Google outline ways to dismantle U.S. democracy.
Sam Altman today revealed that OpenAI will release an open weight artificial intelligence model in the coming months. "We are excited to release a powerful new open-weight language model with reasoning in the coming months," Altman wrote on X.
Log in
Sign Up
AI Tools - Popular
AI Tools - Categories
GPTs - Categories
AI for Jobs
