Recent changes to social media terms now prevent gacha content creators from opting out of their work being used for AI training, effective November 15. This raises concerns among artists regarding the use of their art in generative AI models without consent. Many creators find themselves questioning where to share their art, especially given the limitations posed by local regulations and the rise of alternatives like Blue Sky and Carrot that do not include such terms. Awareness of these issues is crucial for creators navigating the evolving digital landscape.
New terms prevent opting out of AI training using creator works.
Creators' works will feed AI training without their consent.
Alternatives like Blue Sky and Carrot offer protection for creators.
The shift in social media terms signals significant ethical implications for creators, particularly in ownership and consent over their work. As seen with recent changes from platforms like Twitter, artists' intellectual property may be exploited for machine learning training without their awareness or agreement, raising serious concerns about digital rights and the responsibilities of platforms.
The restrictive policies by major social media platforms could drive creators towards alternatives like Blue Sky. This market shift may reshape content sharing practices and create new opportunities for platforms prioritizing creator rights, impacting overall engagement and revenue models within the AI landscape.
The video discusses how creators' works would contribute to AI training without their intention or consent.
The speaker highlights concerns about generative AI models using creators' art without proper opt-out clauses.
The video cites machine learning as a key area where creators' works will be utilized.
Recent terms on Twitter now allow usage of posted works in AI training without an opt-out option, affecting many artists.
The speaker mentions the migration of artists from Instagram due to these concerns.