The video discusses a new competitor to the OV preview model, Deep Seek, a Chinese company known for its Deep Seek Coder model. The speaker compares the performance of both models across various tests, including grammar checks, coding tasks, and reasoning questions. While Deep Seek demonstrates strengths in reasoning, it struggles in certain areas, particularly in coding tasks where both models fail. Ultimately, OV preview model shows superior performance overall, indicating its better suitability for complex queries despite Deep Seek's remarkable progress in AI development.
Introduction of Deep Seek as a competitor to the OV preview model.
Deep Seek’s thinking process differs significantly from OV in problem-solving.
Comparison of both models for generating grammatically correct sentences.
Testing coding ability of both models with a Pac-Man game.
Evaluation of earnings calculation question highlighting performance differences.
The results indicate that while Deep Seek shows promise in reasoning tasks, it still falls short compared to OV in consistency and accuracy. The nuances in response detail and reasoning output reflect underlying differences in model training and design, shedding light on the evolving AI competitive landscape.
The coding task results highlight a significant challenge in developing AI capable of producing executable code in real-world scenarios. Both models demonstrated limitations, indicating that while progress has been made, there remains considerable headroom for improvements in coding algorithms and execution logic.
Deep Seek is recognized for its competitive model that challenges established benchmarks in AI reasoning and coding.
The OV preview consistently demonstrates superior accuracy in complex reasoning tasks compared to its competitors.
The effectiveness of reasoning models is highlighted through performance comparisons in complex question-solving.
Their recent R1 reasoning model is gaining ground in AI capabilities.
Mentions: 7
Its OV preview model is highlighted for superior performance in various tasks against competitors.
Mentions: 9